LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom title=
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom
Reads 14294

Illegal marijuana grow operation raided in Santa Ynez (Photo: Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office)

By edhat staff

Santa Barbara County officials have opened the door to host the world's largest marijuana farm, reports the Los Angeles Times.

Reporter Joe Mozingo takes an in-depth look at how one cannabis company was approved to erect hoop greenhouses over 147 acres, creating the largest legal marijuana grow on earth, while the second largest grow at 83 acres is currently being planted two miles away. 

Santa Barbara County Supervisors voted not to limit the size and number of marijuana grows, chose not to verify grower's applications for licenses or conduct site inspections, and opted to tax grow operations on gross revenue instead of license square footage without a method to verify the numbers resulting in the county receiving a fraction of what was predicted, reports Mozingo.

Marijuana industry lobbyists are being credited for influencing county officials to approve lax regulations in the past two years unlike any other county in the United States. While having 1.8% of California's state lands, farms in Santa Barbara County hold 35% of all issued cultivation licenses while Humboldt County only has 22%.

The investigative article identified county supervisors Das Williams and Steve Lavagnino as lobbyists' points of contact while mentioning supervisor Gregg Hart hired a marijuana lobbyist as his chief of staff. Dennis Bozanich, deputy county executive officer in Santa Barbara County, joined with Williams and Lavagnino to write temporary measures and a broad ordinance regulating the industry.

"Emails and calendars released to The Times through the state public records act show marijuana lobbyists and growers had easy and regular access to Williams and Lavagnino," reports Mozingo.

Both Lavagnino and Williams received campaign contributions from marijuana growers upwards of $12,000 each. A series of email exchanges show Williams advocated on behalf of pot growers to shoot down a proposal that would have required them to bear costs of neighborhood appeals on their permits, he signed and sent a letter to the Coastal Commission that was written by a cannabis consultant regarding a pot ordinance in the coastal zone, frequently socialized with the president of the Carp Growers political coalition, and planned a trip with a marijuana lobbyist.

“The [LA Times article] covers only one side of the story and doesn’t reflect what I’ve done to meet the concerns of Carpinteria residents, which resulted in the Carpinteria Valley having the strictest regulations in the county, including a cap on grows and odor control. We have put in place rigorous enforcement including criminal enforcement in an industry difficult to enforce," Williams said to Jerry Roberts of Newsmakers.

Williams is up for re-election in 2020.

In an interview with Roberts, Lavagnino stated he "totally disagrees" with the LA Times article but has thick skin. Lavagnino went on to defend the transparency of the ordinance drafting process, saying “this was not done in the dark” and noting that there were “60 public meetings” held around it, and shrugged off the suggestion that “we were doing the bidding of one side on this,” reports Roberts.

Read the entire article at

Login to add Comments


Toggle Comments (Show)
Red Creek Jun 13, 2019 10:01 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

Better yet, oust them (Lavagnino, Williams and Hart) from office. It appears they can be bought. Cheaply, at the public's vast expense. $14,000 for an appeal with no cost to the industry? Unbelievable.

Factotum Jun 13, 2019 09:09 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

The recent initiative allowing recreational pot sales and cultivation also allowed for communities to ban these operations in their entirety. I strongly suggest we initiate an outright ban on both. That is our legal right and plenty of other communities have exercised that outright ban too. Let's join this wave of sanity and retake the sanctity of our own town from these rapacious outsiders.

a-1591370694 Jun 13, 2019 10:53 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

FACTOTUM - No, you don't need to ban recreational pot sales do fix this. You just implement stricter regulations on the out of control growing that's being allowed. No need to ruin it for everyone.

Red Creek Jun 13, 2019 08:48 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

The marijuana lobby is ferocious, and tricky. After two Planning Commissioners in Goleta stated they wanted "unlimited" cannabis outlets for the City in a public meeting, an industry "expert" told the Planning Commission and staff that he did not know if there were standards for them in a City, which was a blatant miscommunication, resulting in 15 approved. After public outrage, the number was reduced to 6; although the "standard' quoted for other Cities was one shop per 25,000 population, which was leave Goleta with one. The misinformation is only part of the problem, economic incentives are some of the biggest factors behind favoring the industry at the public's expense.

pacoleta Jun 13, 2019 08:44 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

This situation reflects County leaders putting dollar signs ahead of constituents ‘ interests. No one wants to live near one of these massive pot farms. We need to be able to appeal projects without paying exorbitant fees for the privilege

Bird Jun 13, 2019 10:04 AM
LA Times Exposes Santa Barbara's Marijuana Boom

What is the cost of an Appeal (in the County)? The SB City just raised by $200 the cost of Appeals of city board decisions to $745, with Mayor Murillo saying, and others agreeing, they should be more! (They also just voted to allow restaurants to have free use of the sidewalks, removing the present fees of existing restaurants, a loss of approx. $75K so it's obviously not about the money.) ...Such Appeals are the only way residents can protest a decision. Clearly, the council majority does not want to hear the protests; I hoped the County was different.


Please Login or Register to comment on this.