The morning commute along the South Coast has seen a major shift with a new train service offering an alternative to relying on cars and avoiding the congestion on Highway 101.
The Amtrak Pacific Surfliner has launched a new morning route serving cities in Ventura County, including Ventura, Oxnard, and Simi Valley.
The new service, which started on May 4, 2026, will allow passengers to reach Santa Barbara shortly before 8 a.m., with a stop in Goleta, according to a KEYT report.
Passengers who disembarked at Santa Barbara and needed a ride to a nearby destination were offered a complimentary shuttle by the Metropolitan Transit District, according to the report.
Stops include several critical hubs, including the University of California, Santa Barbara, the Hollister Tech Corridor, Cottage Hospital, and government offices in downtown Santa Barbara.
For many commuters, the train service replaces the daily drive along Highway 101, which often stretches more than an hour due to heavy traffic in the morning.
The new train service is part of a broader transportation plan to boost connectivity throughout the Central Coast, which includes both expanded rail options and ongoing freeway enhancements, such as adding lanes in both directions.
On May 3, 2026, Pacific Surfliner announced on social media that it was expanding service to San Luis Obispo. Launched in partnership with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) and Ventura County Transportation Commission, the new service will make travel more convenient along the Central Coast.
In April 2026, Amtrak Pacific Surfliner announced it would introduce a daily round-trip service and expand peak-hour service from May 4 to offer more options for daily commuters traveling between Ventura County, Santa Barbara, and beyond.
In addition to helping commuters avoid traffic on Highway 101, the train service will also improve regional connectivity alongside the ongoing Highway 101 improvements between Carpinteria and Santa Barbara.
Passenger rail between Ventura County and the South Coast is partially financed by the voter-approved Measure A transportation sales tax within Santa Barbara County, which invests in projects that ease congestion and improve mobility.
Earlier this year, the SBCAG approved a 12-month pilot project to expand peak-hour Pacific Surfliner rail service in the counties of Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Ventura.
The expanded service will cover regional stations, such as Lompoc-Surf and Guadalupe.
The expansion will be delivered through additional Pacific Surfliner service operated by the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor Agency to restore pre-pandemic service levels and provide more affordable commuting options.
Together, these improvements are expected to reduce congestion on Highway 101, boost regional connectivity, encourage more commuters to use public transportation, and lower dependence on cars.
Also Read
- Fast-Moving Sandy Fire in Simi Valley Burns Over 1,300 Acres, Forces Evacuations For Thousands of Residents
- 20 killer whales show up off California coast in unexpected encounter
- High Surf Advisory Issued for Central Coast and Southern California Beaches This Weekend
- Ventura County Breaks Ground on 88-Unit Permanent Supportive Housing Project
- Commercial Fire on Calle Bolero in Camarillo Quickly Knocked Down
Fantastic. Took a long time but better late than never. Let’s see what happens with ridership. Anyone riding the boondoggle “Train to Nowhere” yet? Of course not.
BASIC, I know you fancy yourself as being “clever,” but the train you’re obsessed with doesn’t exist yet. So, no…… no one is riding it.
Hope that clears things up for you.
Obviously the train doesn’t exist yet. It should have ben operational 6 years ago. The good thing is CA is #2 on cost overruns on a commuter train project. Hawaii’s train is estimated to cost $100 million a mile more than the California train. Two examples of liberal states failing on major projects.
Real countries have the full backing of their federal government for high speed rail and yhe project isn’t left to individual statrs or provinces.. Republicans have turned the US into an S-hole. Please tell us which MAGA state is on budget with their high speed rail project. Does it hurt to excrete so much garbage out of your ears? budget +3 The proposed Texas high-speed rail project connecting Dallas and Houston is significantly over its original budget and facing major funding uncertainty. Grow up.
Sail, I don’t perceive you as a person who reads much. In addition to the high speed rail in Texas and Alaska’s bridge to nowhere, here are just a few more red state failures. Believe me, there are many, many more…
Florida High-Speed Rail,
Texas Electric Infrastructure/Grid Failure,
Jackson, Mississippi Water System,
Austin, Texas Toll Road ,
Kentucky Lock Addition Project
You wouldn’t wany me yo expand with more examples as it is more evudence republicans couldn”t manage a frosty freeze.
Also give us examples of red states failing on major projects or admit that you are utterly lacking in intellectual honesty and integrity.
Basic,
You people have spent decades favoring iinvestments in (and bailing out) the automobile and airline industries. The incessant lobbying from those industries (that Repuds love to bail out) delayed passenger rail development. Look how many other countries have high speed rail. …. becauae the federal government prioritized it. The US is on the way down. Does it hurt to be so dumb?
Why do people continue to ignore the major powerful resistance to the high speed rail project that is the Big Ag money who have put lead the resistance to this project and have demanded unreasonable compensation for the lands that need to be used for the right of way. The route has been realigned to avoid these creeps. This is particularly galling in that the land they claim is so valuable was made so by infrastructure provided by the taxpayers such as Interstate 5 and the California Water Project. I know it is naive to expect that greed would cede a small part of its avarice for the public good but I am disappointed nevertheless.
While the budget for land acquisition and legal fees has surged from $3 billion to $15 billion within the latest $126 billion estimate, the labor framework remains a significant structural cost driver.
California’s regulatory environment—specifically prevailing wage mandates, Project Labor Agreements (PLAs), and “standby pay” for idle crews—contributes to a per-mile cost of nearly $200 million. By comparison, similar high-speed rail systems in France are completed for roughly $60 million per mile. Over the 500 miles planned, this labor framework accounts for $100 billion in costs in California, compared to $30 billion for the same distance in France.
And we care about comparing old data from another country with totally different landscape and conditions to our situation, why?
Someone is conveniently leaving out a number of other factors France’s lower cost in the build than expensive labor alone….
It seems you’re overlooking the reality of global competition. Dismissing these economic pressures suggests an isolationist stance similar to the ‘closed borders’ platform.
To illustrate the cost difference: Brightline West utilizes a mix of union and non-union labor without a Project Labor Agreement (PLA), resulting in a projected labor cost of $30 billion for 500 miles. In contrast, California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) requires 100% union labor under a PLA, contributing to a much higher labor cost of $100 billion for the same distance.
It seems you’re overlooking the reality of the other factors contributing to cost than only labor – In order to further your political diatribe. You leave out some very simple factors (land acquisition cost for one). France built high-speed rail (TGV) much cheaper and faster than the U.S. by using dedicated, straight tracks, centralized government planning, and lower land acquisition costs. Some other key cost differences (besides labor and land) include centralized planning and funding, dedicated track infrastructure (not to share with freight), geography density and OPPOSING LOBBIES (such as yourself) which can cause enormous delays and cost overrun. I understand you people want to listen to fox news and believe you are an expert based on nativist populist drivel, but that simply isn’t how the world works.
Land acquisition hit $15 billion (up from a $3 billion budget), but labor is the true outlier at $100 billion. It’s hard to ignore that Brightline West is doing 500 miles for $30 billion total while CAHSR’s PLA mandates have sent costs into the stratosphere.
When even leaders like Gavin Newsom and Katie Porter start questioning these labor requirements, it’s time to admit the current model is broken. I want the bullet train; I just don’t want to overpay for it
Since you seem to have no idea what the cost should reasonably be, how would you ever know? You just want to be a victim.
Spoken like a true union organizer: why build a train in five years for $30 billion when you can stretch it to fifty years for $100 billion? I’m not a ‘victim,’ I’m just the guy paying for your members’ third vacation homes.
You’re just someone indulging in MAGA fantasies and victimhood.
> Spoken like a true union organizer
Union organizers are wholly good people. Anyone demonizing union organizers is an enemy of humanity.
> I’m just the guy paying for your members’ third vacation homes.
You’re just the guy who must blatantly lie to make an argument.
Citizen, perhaps we can take the 187 Billion taken from SNAP in the big beautiful bill (when the tax cuts were extended to the rich and the corporations) to help fund the project.
If the only way to fund your project is to wait for a total overhaul of the US tax code, you’re admitting the current model is a failure. Let’s stick to the $100 billion labor bill—or is that too uncomfortable to discuss without a script about corporate greed?
Citizen, You were the one that went off topic – instead of chatting about our beloved little Surfliner. Heck, you got too uncomfortable discussing other costs contributing to the high cost of the rail (your political agenda) even when I wasn’t disagreeing about high labor costs. It is uncomfortable for you to understand that other countries are doing great things with the backing of their government – while ours rots in Republican greed and burns in MAGA cynicism. So, if we are going to be off topic – and talk about waste in government, let’s talk about the planes Noem bought, or the unneeded Ballroom. Or heck, where did all the money we save with DOGE go?
I for one am ok with paying people for their labor. And what kind of dishonest garbage denies corporate greed? Hell, it’s baked into Adam Smith’s work and our incorporation laws referring to “fiduciary responsibility” to stockholders.
Nobody but you implied that was the only way.
But, nice strawman there.
You con nitwits have no clue about economics in the real world.
> to wait for a total overhaul of the US tax code
Why do you find it necessary to constantly lie? Undoing the wealth transfer enacted in the BBB isn’t an overhaul of the tax code. Or if it is …
> If the only way to fund your project[s] is to [pass the BBB] you’re admitting the current model is a failure.
So you’re saying the Trumpism is a failure.
> Let’s stick to the $100 billion labor bill
Why do we have to stick to the topics that lying fascist trolls want to discuss?
The proposed Texas high-speed rail project connecting Dallas and Houston is significantly over its original budget and facing major funding uncertainty. So yell us abouy California some more….
Nice to have additional Amtrak routes and hopefully people will utilize the new service. The morning mess on 101 heading from the south into the Santa Barbara area has just reached a new level of commuter hell. Folks trying to beat the backup take to Calle Real and Hwy. 192. Along with 101, Calle Real, Ortega Hill, N. Jameson, and 192 stack/back up on a daily basis. People are addicted to their private vehicles, even when alternatives such as Amtrak, commuter buses, and MTD are available. People may be eco-conscious, but take no action. Traffic continues to get worse by the day, which increases air pollution as well. As far as the high-speed rail goes…that’s a joke and a great example of how NOT to implement such a system. Almost 250 billion dollars has been spent without a single passenger. Possibly someone can go from Bakersfield to Madera in 2035. I can see cost overruns, but it’s looking more like the final cost will be 10x to 15x the original estimate. Then, there’s the question as to whether or not anyone will actually pay to use the HS train, or should I say “ghost” train.
BeeKnee dropping another loaded diaper
BeeKnee do you not research thr drivel you post, or do you just lie like a MAGAcan goblin? $250 billion HAS NOT BEEN SPENT ON CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL. Either educate yourself or stop lying.
Bend knees, expel MAGA flatulence.
13.8, not 250, bozo.
We can fund it with some of the 187 Billion Trump stole from SNAP in the big beautiful bill – you know the bill where you Republicons extended the tax credits for the rich and corporations?