World’s Oldest Snow Leopard Dies at Santa Barbara Zoo

Everett the snow leopard (Photo: Santa Barbara Zoo)

By edhat staff

Everett, the world’s oldest snow leopard, passed away just three weeks before his 22nd birthday on Tuesday, May 21 at the Santa Barbara Zoo. 

Zoo officials report Everett had been receiving treatment for ailments common with elderly big cats, including osteoarthritis, renal failure, and hypertension.

“In the last few months, we have seen a loss in body condition, deterioration of his coat, and decreased mobility. This past week, he had trouble getting up and moving around, despite an increase in medication for his osteoarthritis.  Because he was declining quickly, we felt humane euthanasia was the best welfare option for him,” said Dr. Julie Barnes, the Zoo’s Vice President of Animal Care & Health.

Everett’s companion, Zoe, passed away in February. “Both Everett and Zoe lived very long and full lives and have been wonderful ambassadors for this endangered species, which faces so many challenges in the wild,” said Dr. Barnes.

Everett’s body has been sent to Midwestern University in Arizona for a study on the vascular anatomy of snow leopards. He was considered the oldest snow leopard in any zoo accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Snow leopards are critically endangered and currently number between an estimated 3,900 and 6,400 in the mountains of Central Asia. They have long been prized as hunter’s trophies, destroyed as predators of domestic flocks, and sought as a source of valuable fur.

 

Past Articles

 February 19, 2019: Female Snow Leopard Zoe Dies at Santa Barbara Zoo

Edhat Staff

Written by Edhat Staff

What do you think?

Comments

0 Comments deleted by Administrator

Leave a Review or Comment

9 Comments

  1. So sad! I was just at the zoo with my family a couple weeks ago and we were really looking forward to seeing the snow leopards. Now I know why the exhibit was closed. 🙁 Rest in Peace, sweet Everett.

  2. You mean he didn’t volunteer to spend his life in a small enclosure and then have his body sent off for dissection? I hope his immense sacrifice was worth it, and means that others of his kind might continue to live in the wild, but I doubt it.

  3. I suppose it depends on whether you believe that some of the most vulnerable and endangered animals should be allowed to die from habitat loss and hunting, or if you believe that some of these animals should be kept in captivity to preserve their species from extinction. The idea being that humans don’t have their act together yet and may kill these species before we figure out a better way, and perhaps if we figure it out in time, we could reintroduce these animals into their former habitats. On the other hand with climate change, many of these animals habitats may no longer even exist to reintroduce them back into if we were to be able to.
    Is it more humane to kill off entire species with our own greed and stupidity outright, allowing these wild creatures to live in their habitats while they’re being destroyed, or is it more humane to try and capture some and force them to live their lives in captivity? I suppose it is a matter of perspective, as well as the size and qualifications of the facility.

  4. You might want to start first with the senseless destruction of habitat and hunting. Go work on that one. Slow population growth. Get though to uneducated people who do not care. Prevent them from killing these cats because they’re afraid or feel dominant. As soon as you’ve got this figured out, and you can guarantee species habitat and longevity, then we can talk about zoos.

  5. The cats were so “kitty like” in the video, like over grown house pets. They didn’t look unhappy and seemed to have room to move and play in. If it is all they have ever known they don’t know to miss being in the wild. I just don’t have any answers to the “prison or wild” argument.

Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Motorcade in Santa Barbara for Vice President’s Family