This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
By Rachel Becker, Kristen Hwang, Alejandro Lazo, Cayla Mihalovich and Jeanne Kuang, CalMatters
John Lauretig remembers the filthy bathrooms, the overflowing trash cans and the community of people who rallied to clean up Joshua Tree National Park the last time the U.S. Government shut down.
For more than a month from December 2018 through January 2019, thousands of National Park Service employees were furloughed nationwide — but the Trump administration kept many national parks open.
Unsupervised, visitors drove through wilderness and historic sites, camped where they weren’t supposed to, and vandalized plants and buildings at parks across California. The trash — and the feces — piled up. In the days after the shutdown ended, park staff found at least 1,665 clumps of toilet paper littering Death Valley alone, where an estimated half-ton of human waste had been left outside the restrooms.
“It was insane to leave the gates open and tell the staff not to show up in the park — for our public lands, and all of our special places in this country, to be unprotected,” said Lauretig, a retired law enforcement park ranger and president of the Friends of Joshua Tree nonprofit.
Now, facing the prospect of another imminent shutdown, conservation groups and retired park service employees including Lauretig are calling to keep the gates locked at national parks and historic landmarks.
They’re among many Californians bracing for the shutdown, which is expected to begin Wednesday unless Democrats and Republicans can make a deal by 11:59 p.m. on Tuesday.
As of now, the parties appear far apart, although President Donald Trump and congressional leaders are expected to meet today. Democratic leaders in Congress are demanding that Republicans reverse Medicaid cuts made in Trump’s signature tax and spending bill earlier this year and extend Biden-era subsidies used by a majority of Affordable Care Act enrollees.
In response, the Trump administration has floated firing federal workers en masse if the shutdown occurs.
“Democrats are hoping to use the one bit of leverage that they have left in Washington at this time to make it clear what they stand for,” said Thad Kousser, a political science professor at UC San Diego. “And the question is: Can they hold out against the political and policy pain that Donald Trump is hoping to impose by threatening more layoffs of government employees?”
The federal government shut down three times during the Obama and Trump presidencies. Each one presents a hardship for government employees, who are either furloughed or obliged to work without pay.
About 150,000 federal employees work in California, not counting the military service members who also will go without pay during a shutdown.
In the past when facing possible federal shutdowns, the state had a contingency plan to try to avoid disruptions in certain services. In late 2023, it planned to pay one month’s worth of federal food assistance early to advance aid to families in the event of a shutdown.
But this year there’s no such commitment yet from the Department of Finance, as Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration weighs the possibility of a lengthy shutdown.
“There isn’t an open-ended long-term line of credit where the state’s general fund can be assumed to make up for any federal fund shortfall,” finance spokesperson H.D. Palmer said.
Here’s a look at what Californians can expect to happen if a shutdown occurs this week.
Social Security and health care
Most Californians shouldn’t worry about a federal shutdown impacting their Social Security benefits or their health care access in the near term.
About 6.5 million Californians receive benefits through the Social Security Administration and those checks are expected to continue going out during a shutdown.
But, customer service could suffer depending on how many employees are told to stay home, according to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare.
That includes “benefit verifications, earnings record corrections and updates, overpayments processing, and replacing Medicare cards. The level of disruption will depend on how many (Social Security Administration) employees the Trump administration deems ‘essential’ and ‘non-essential’ during the shutdown,” Max Richtman, the organization’s president, said in a written statement.
Medicaid and Medicare, which pay for health care for low-income individuals, people with disabilities and seniors, are mandatory programs that are exempt from the annual appropriations process.
Jan Emerson-Shea, spokesperson for the California Hospital Association, said “essential services” like insurance payments to hospitals and doctors will continue.
Some discretionary programs, however, like food stamps and benefits for women, infants and children may be impacted by a shutdown.
One group that could be disproportionately affected by even a brief federal shutdown are native and indigenous populations. Many of the 723,000 American Indians living in California get health care at clinics that are funded through federal grants. The clinics are often small and may have very little reserves to weather a funding pause, said Nanette Star, policy director for the California Consortium for Urban Indian Health.
“Even a short shutdown can mean staff furloughs, service cuts, patient service delays,” Star said.
Airports and travel
You’ll be able to fly and take trains during a government shutdown, but you might experience more delays.
That’s because air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration agents are among the government employees who would be expected to show up for work without getting paid. The longer a shutdown drags out, the more likely it is that the system will strain and workers will call in sick.
The U.S. Travel Association, which advocates for the industry, released a statement last week that included a survey showing many people would cancel or postpone travel during a shutdown, which it argued would ripple through the economy.
“A shutdown is a wholly preventable blow to America’s travel economy—costing $1 billion every week—and affecting millions of travelers and businesses while placing unnecessary strain on an already overextended federal travel workforce,” said Geoff Freeman, the organization’s president.
Wildfires and disasters
A federal shutdown won’t ground firefighters, but could slow the money that pays for future disaster prep.
Nick Schuler, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said the agency does not expect a shutdown to affect its “ability to respond to and aggressively attack fires” and will continue to operate as normal. In past shutdowns, he said, U.S. Forest Service firefighters have still been available for emergency response and pointed to California’s “robust Master Mutual Aid System,” which ensures resources respond regardless of jurisdiction.

Still, he cautioned that what keeps engines running today might not pay for the prevention work of tomorrow: “Any disruption to grant funding that supports fire prevention and wildfire resiliency could have negative impacts,” he said.
Newsom’s office said the Federal Emergency Management Agency would keep “core life-saving operations” going during a shutdown but that payments to states would stall and recovery efforts would be put on hold. That means Californians could see first responders in action but face delays in reimbursement or recovery projects.
Other science agencies like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey could face interruptions that affect California’s disaster readiness, the governor’s spokesperson said.
National parks
National parks supporters are worried that the Trump administration again would send home workers but leave open the gates.
That’s “a recipe for even more disaster,” said Kate Groetzinger, communications manager at the Center for Western Priorities, an environmental advocacy group. “It will be worse this time than it was last time around, simply because the parks are already struggling.”
She was referring to federal staffing cuts the Trump administration carried out earlier this year. The National Parks Conservation Association estimates that the National Park Service has lost 24% of its permanent staff since Trump’s second term began, and left thousands of seasonal positions unfilled.
If a shutdown does occur, the association projects daily losses of $1 million in fee revenue for the parks, and $77 million for the gateway communities that surround them.
Morale among National Park workers is bad already — and a shutdown would make it worse, said Bernadette Johnson, a former superintendent of Manzanar National Historic Site, where during World War II the U.S. Government incarcerated thousands of Japanese Americans.
“The attack has just been so furious. And I think that federal employees are being demonized, as these lazy bureaucrats that we are not … It breaks my heart to watch,” Johnson said. “The people left behind are holding all of that work now, because the work didn’t go away.”
A spokesperson for the The National Park Service said the agency is reviewing and updating plans for a lapse in funding.
However a shutdown may play out, Lauretig over at Joshua Tree said he’s ready.
“I still have a loft (full) of toilet paper, trash bags, bleach, cleaning materials, gloves waiting for the next event — which, you know, could be imminent.”
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
Also Read
- Sable Restarts Oil Production in Santa Barbara County as State Parks Denies Easement
- San Luis Obispo Cracks Down on Two Cal Poly Fraternities After Repeated Violations and Unpaid Fees
- EōS Fitness Expands in Santa Barbara with Massive New Downtown Gym
- Milan-Based Fashion Brand Eleventy Opens Boutique in Montecito
- One of the Biggest Night Markets in the US Returns to Southern California










Thank Trump, the MAGAcrats and the cowardly Republicans too afraid to speak up for, the Orwellian, dystopian clown show.
Typical MAGA losers in Congress would rather shutdown the government than try to secure healthcare for US citizens. When one party controls both houses of Congress, the White House AND the Supreme Court, there is only ONE side to blame. All the Dems wanted was to keep American citizens covered by their health insurance. Apparently, that’s a hard NO for the MAGA gang.
Wrong again. The tipping point for the Dems was about free healthcare for illegal aliens. It looks like that game is over. Try and stay up to date. But you ARE correct about the Republicans controlling the branches of government. I wonder why that came about?
Throw in your DEI mantra, males vs. females in youth sports, DEM-supported Antifa antics, psycho lefties rioting on ICE, and the shooting of federal officials including the President and there you go. Your party needs a real leader.
BASIC – You’re in no position to use the word, “wrong,” as you’ve never said anything factually correct here as long as I’ve seen your comments.
And yes, once again, YOU. ARE. WRONG. This was not, never has been, and could never be about “free healthcare for illegal aliens.” They are not eligible for the ACA or Medicaid, nor are they allowed to vote, and you’ve been told this 100 times.
Further, the Dems are pushing for AMERICAN CITIZENS to keep their health insurance. The only ones spreading this lie about “free healthcare for illegal aliens” are the liars like you and the criminal rapist you voted for.
Your constant lying is tiresome. Learn about how your government works. As a supposed “doctor,” you should know this. It’s pathetic that you don’t.
Who do you think pays for illegal immigrants and others that have zero health insurance when they show up in the ER?
Look, being on the wrong side must be tiring you out. I get it. Losing sucks.
BASIC – Wow… that is actually golden right there. You seriously don’t understand what you actually oppose LOL 🤣🤣🤣🤣
A) That has nothing to do with the ACA and Medicaid. They are unable to receive those benefits so nothing is changing there.
B) This is EXACTLY why Dems SUPPORT health insurance for undocumented immigrants. Thanks for making our argument for us. I’ve said this 100s of times here. Glad you finally get it.
C) ALSO, this is EXACTLY why us Dems want to keep our population covered! Replace the word “illegal immigrants” with “low income US citizens” and say your comment out loud. Read it again. Now, one more time.
You point out the exact reason why health insurance matters to a society as a whole and think (with your weird, ignorance fueled logic) that this why we shouldn’t extend the benefits.
You are losing so hard and you’re seriously and obviously too slow to understand what you’re even saying. This is comedy gold!
Judge Judy? Do you watch her?? She would agree with Basic!
Basic, show us where in the ACA that Illegal immigrants receive free healthcare. What is really sad is you are.making an argument parroting by FOX News pundits. Its such a dumb but easily verifiable argument that you make.
Sacjon: Now that the Dems have decided to bow out of the process, Trump and his team are going to take a scalpel (or hatchet/axe/chainsaw) to all of the programs and departments that their heart desires. There simply is no denying that the longer the government is shut down, the more damage Trump will inflict. With almost no oversight (greatly diminished) by Dems, the “S” just hit the fan and most of the country is blaming Schumer for this catastrophe. Trump is holding most of the cards, but the Dems think that they somehow will be able take all the cards away to play in their favor. That play or approach isn’t going over to well amongst the vast majority of voters. Completely avoidable, yet completely predictable. We still plan to visit the National Parks because we figure a lot of people are canceling trips to places like Zion/Arches/Yellowstone. Should be a LOT less traffic in those areas as well (“Cody, WY….Here We Come!”).
BEES – the Dems didn’t “bow out of anything.” Where are the Republicans right now as the Dems have been in DC, in Congress waiting to work on a solution? Answer: gone. They’re on vacation. Get your facts straight.
Why are you blaming the Dems when it’s the Republicans who refused to sign their bill extending subsidies for the ACA and Medicaid?
Everyone knows who is truly to blame here. They always do this.
The Republicans should have stayed in DC to work things out, but I’m sure they were ordered to scram. Unfortunately, this is what politicians do these days. Somewhat similar to what happened in Texas when the (D) leadership to their members to scram. This tit-for-tat business has got to stop. The funny thing is that so many people in the Red states are going to be affected by the shutdown more so than those in the Blue states. Go figure.
You are SO uninformed, intellectually dishonest, and tiresome. I know you didn’t vote for Trump but it’s understandable that others here think you did.
Sacjon & MarcelK: The (R) plan is to get at least 7 (D) senators to break rank and vote with them to stop the shutdown. Otherwise, the stalemate will continue. It would be hard to disagree with the statement by Speaker Johnson that the shutdown has “handed the keys of the kingdom” to Trump. Now, Trump is free to cut, chop, defund, remove, fire, etc. at will. No one thinks Trump is NOT going to go completely nuts and “clear cut” whatever he wants. The best thing to happen would be to get Schumer and his people on board for the time being and fight the good fight another day (of their choosing…like after the midterms). The approach is quite simple but something needs to give.
BEES – no. They need to stand up to him. They are fighting for healthcare for Americans. We support that. Why don’t you?
BeesKnees, As MarcelK has said, your statements are uniformed and intellectually dishonest. Trump has already used the “keys to the kingdom” = Do you remember DOGE? He has been chopping without rhyme nor reason If someone doesn’t stand up to TRUMP now – he will keep moving. That is how fascism progresses, people stay silent, politicians don’t fight. There are MANY Republicans using the ACA – do you think they want their premiums to rise by 75% on Jan 1? That would sink the ship. I think the only reason you are concerned at all is that it is going to affect your planned national park getaway.
GeneralTree: Don’t make this about your fellow commenters. Even someone who is not uninformed and intellectually dishonest knows that the shutdown is EXACTLY what Trump wanted. Talk about one’s head in the sand…LOL! The shutdown was planned all along by Trump and now he can do anything that he wants to do. Trump does not care if tens of thousands of government workers lose their jobs. He doesn’t care that people are losing their homes. He doesn’t care about any of the stuff that we care about. There is no “fight” because all the keys (power) is now in the hands of The Don. Start thinking people and stop being the victim all the time…you are NOT victims!
BEESKNEES – YES, Correct! You got it. And you voted for this – this is on you. You are part of the problem. You seem to really be late to the conversation – of course this was his plan.
Don’t start pretending all of a sudden that you are a democrat. That is a weird flex and weird reversal. The only victims are you republicans that are led to the watering hole by your leaders who manipulate you with fear. This is time for democrats to fight, and not to stick their heads in the sand.
BeesKnees – Which part of Republicans are spineless cowards and Democrats are going to stand up for their rights did you not understand?
No BeesKnees, Democrats are going to stand up and not cower in fear like Repubs.
Also Bees – what you propose is putting your head in the sand to fascism – so it won’t affect your sight seeing trip of National Parks.
There is much validity to this position.
I’m not saying there is a solution. I hold a very liberal political position.
When I read a few weeks back, before the shutdown, that Fetterman was against a shutdown, I was shocked.
When I read his explanation, that it would give tRump such room and liberty to do what tRump is doing, I blanched. I stopped to think. I agreed with Fetterman.
But I also agree with fighting rRump, even by shutdown. I detest everything he purportedly stands for and does.
Totally caught between a rock and a hard place.
This timeline is horrible and terrible and everything s * cks
I too was deeply disappointed by Fetterman.
But you gotta give some kudos to him for thought.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/10/03/fetterman-heres-why-shutdown-is-fundamentally-wrong/
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5529381-fetterman-shutdown-trump-benefits/
I deeply believe that nuanced discussion is impossible on most online sites and this one.
More discussion of this conundrum:
“All the while, the president has ignored claims that he is overstepping his power, brushing off lawsuits and promising to prevail.
And now, he is seizing the shutdown to continue the shock and awe that he brought into the West Wing in January — and to continue his effort to remake the federal government, and the country, on his own terms.
Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker and occasional Trump adviser, said the administration learned a clear lesson from its first term — and specifically from the 2018 shutdown:
“You’re either serious about this level of change or you’re not,” he said. “And if you’re serious about it, you have to move very fast.”
Gingrich said much of the resulting strategy comes from a core group of Trump advisers including Russell Vought, the White House budget director who served in the same role in Trump’s first presidency. These officials had four years “in the wilderness,” Gingrich said, to evaluate how to make rapid and long-lasting changes in the federal government.
Their conclusion was that the first Trump administration did not move with decisive speed, allowing nonpolitical federal employees, or appointees who had fallen out of favor with Trump, to stymie the White House’s efforts. Their action plan was to plot clear steps on how to more forcefully wield the White House’s power.
On Wednesday, the first day of the shutdown, Vought presented the battle lines the White House hopes to draw. He told House Republicans in a call that layoffs of federal workers would begin within days, The Washington Post reported — a plan that immediately drew scrutiny as potentially illegal. And OMB said that the Trump administration would put a hold on funding for infrastructure and clean-energy projects in 16 of the 19 states that voted for Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.
The strategy carries political and legal risks. The White House is attempting to pint [sic] blame for the shutdown on the Democrats at a time when the Republican Party controls both chambers of Congress. And senior federal officials have counseled several agencies against firing employees while the government is shuttered, pointing to statutes that labor unions cited this week in a lawsuit aiming to block threatened mass layoffs.
…
As the White House continues to blame the Democrats for the shutdown, there are signs that message is not breaking through to the American public. A Washington Post poll published Thursday found significantly more Americans blame President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans for the shutdown than Democrats, though many say they are not sure.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/10/04/trump-shutdown-strategy/
My apologies for quoting from Wa Post, which I cancelled. They too ask for a sign up in order to read their articles, which I learned from a response to a cited article here on edhat.
Schumer & Company just made one of the biggest political blunders in US history. They have just completely opened the door to Trump & Company to dismantle any/all government departments that they want to close. Thousands upon thousands of people will be losing their jobs and services throughout will be diminished. Instead of teaching Trump a lesson, Trump is now going on the “warpath” against everything that most people in the country want…except the MAGA types.
BeesKnees, My goodness, are you really this criminally misinformed? The other alternative is that it is an act. Do a little reading outside of the algorithm. The demo stayed to vote, the Tepublicans called the recess. Don doesn’t have to fire hundreds of thousands of workers. You voted for all of this. PROJECT 2025. RUSS VOUGHT is putting into action what YOU voted for, deconstruction of the administrative state.
Bees Knees. Your vote for Trump was a vote for Project 2025. Russ Vought, Trumps Director of Office Management and Budhet, was the author of Project 2025. Do you remember when Trump said he didn’t know what Project 2025 was? Vought’s vision was to remove 1 MILLION federal workers. This has nothing to do with Schumer. This has to fo with who you voted for.
GeneralTree: Regardless of what a person’s political stance is on this, we should be able to agree that a government “shakeup” has been long overdue. A bloated government does not operate very efficiently, so after some precision cuts, most of us should see long-term benefits. Washington should simply stop with all the finger pointing and playing the blame game and get on with the business of running the government in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
BeesKnees You have literally contradicted what you have previously written. No, I dont agree with you. This is not a government shake up. It is a criminal mis-use of presidential power that is driven my Christian Nationalist and Billionaire oligarchs.. You pointed your finger at Chuck Schumer. And now you are saying don’t point fingers. You MAGAcrats are ALL alike – Deflect and move the target. Horrible way to live and destroy our country and our constitution.
Bees, your statements are literally how democracy dies and how the tepublic is enveloped by darkness.
“Precision cuts.”
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Bend those knees!
BeesKnees – Did you miss DOGE prior to the government shut down?
Blaming one side is ridiculous. This happened with Clinton, Obama and countless others. It is a ridiculous waste of tax payer money. Dems are going against things they agreed on not that long ago because their agenda is to NEVER support the current administration.
The last 2 shutdowns were under Trump for a total of 38 days.
Republicans have the majority. Republicans recessed before a vote on the dem proposal. Obama and Clinton didn’t threaten to FIRE Republicans when government was shut down. When Clinton trimmed the federal workforce he did so with the approval of congress and not unelected Russ Vought and Elon.
Boom! Arch right winger pretends to B bothsideser (which is already one of the lowest forms of life).
https://www.axios.com/2025/10/03/mike-johnson-government-shutdown-house-votes
Thanks for the link, but Axios is now asking for a free sign up in order to read the article.