Santa Barbara Mayor and Top Rivals Agree to Debate

By Jerry Roberts of Newsmakers

Mayor Cathy Murillo and challengers James Joyce, Randy Rowse, Deborah Schwartz and Mark Whitehurst all have accepted an invitation for a Santa Barbara mayoral debate co-sponsored by Newsmakers and the “Santa Barbara Talks” podcast.

The event, the first meeting of all the top candidates in the city election campaign season, is scheduled for Friday, Aug. 27. It will be recorded and available on video on Newsmakers’ You Tube channel, and on Santa Barbara Talks, shortly after, through the Nov. 2 election.

The debate, to be produced by Hap Freund and co-moderated by podcast proprietor Josh Molina and our own genial host, also will be broadcast on the TV Santa Barbara public access channel through the election, as well as available through other news organizations,..

Among the issues to be covered: economic development, homelessness, housing and other critical policy matters.

Newsmakers and Santa Barbara Talks also is co-sponsoring similar events for the City Council races in Districts 4 and 6, and we’ll have more information on those soon.

Thanks to the candidates for agreeing to share their views with our audiences, and for putting themselves out there to run for public office.

Who is Larry Elder

Less than four weeks before the Sept. 14 recall election — mail ballots are arriving this week — embattled Gov. Gavin Newsom has switched messages, cutting back on touting his own record, in favor of drawing sharp contrasts between himself and radio talk show host and conservative heartthrob Larry Elder, who has been leading many polls of potential replacements. As Politico reported:

“Larry Elder is an anti-vax conspiracy spreader — not the guy you want in office while Delta rages,” Newsom wrote in a recent fundraising email entitled “Larry Elder.” “Now hear this: Larry Elder is just 2 points from being our next governor. Sorry to scare you, but it’s true.”

Elder, a Black Republican, has a long and checkered career on radio in L.A. including a stormy stint on KABC in the 1990s, when he was the target of a well-organized community effort to get him fired for being the “White Man’s Poster Boy” because of espousing positions such as minimizing racism, bashing affirmative action and proclaiming O.J. Simpson’s guilt.

The best piece we’ve read about him – which details Elder’s opposition to abortion rights, gun control and the minimum wage, among other issues – comes from veteran political writer (and Friend of Newsmakers) Carla Marinucci and her partner, Jeremy White, Politico’s chief California correspondents. Highly recommended.

One more thing: Here’s Elder on “The Morning Answer,” on L.A.’s AM 870, explaining why Joe Biden didn’t really win the 2020 election.

We regret the whole thing.

Sure, forgetting things is one of the crummy features of getting old. Remembering things that never happened is even worse, however.

So it was that Newsmakers “remembered,” and so reported in Tuesday’s post, that SB mayoral candidate Randy Rowse had once been a Republican, a non-Actual Fact that we should have checked before publishing but didn’t.

“Jerry – I have to give you a hearty WTF? this morning,” Rowse emailed bright and early on Wednesday. “.I am not now, nor have I ever been, a Republican…Most of my adult life was spent as a registered Dem, until I switched to Decline to State some years ago.”

False memories, indeed.

For our perspective, it seemed an especially untoward factual error, because one of Rowse’s key arguments in the mayor’s race is that purportedly non-partisan office in city government have largely been overtaken by partisan politics. So we invited him on for a quick hit segment to set the record straight. Check it out on YouTube below or by clicking through this link. The podcast version is here.

We get letters

A selection of other feedback to yesterday’s “Power Rankings.”

“Good for Ed St. George: A claim of misogyny in the event of concern for the development of children seems misprioritized. Minors have little leverage in pursuing a superior up-bringing when dealt an over-committed parent.

If the upward mobility of women takes a backseat to the development of children, call me a misogynist. And no, children and parenting won’t be a closeted topic. If you see something, say something.”

— Matt McLaughlin

 

“I have noticed- since I am a sentient being- that every gain that women have fought so hard for, in my lifetime and before – including bodily autonomy- is under assault. I think men have altogether lost their “right” to run their mouths on these topics unchallenged and unchecked.

I am sorry you were triggered by the word “platform”. With the First Amendment right to practice journalism comes a certain responsibility- dont you agree?- not to let unadulterated bullshit go unchallenged? Otherwise, what is the journalist, “old school”,- or complicit?”

— Jana Zimmer

 

Re Item #6 (“Montecito Journal”):

“You like to tell it first. I like to tell it best.”

— Gwyn Lurie, Editor in Chief, Montecito Journal

 

There were no injuries.

Avatar

Written by Jerry Roberts

“Newsmakers” is a multimedia journalism platform that focuses on politics, media and public affairs in Santa Barbara. Learn more at newsmakerswithjr.com

What do you think?

Comments

1 Comments deleted by Administrator

Leave a Review or Comment

13 Comments

  1. Larry Elder is definitely in the fast lane to Sacramento. Arnold did it, and now it’s possibly Larry’s turn. No matter what, we all need to pledge support for whoever prevails in this recall election. Like my good friend used to sayvback in the day, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em!!!”

  2. The newsome radio commercial is horrible… he took the complete wrong tone. The recall is “anti-Vaxxers and people who stormed the capital”… ???? Nutty… nutty!!! Can we please get a moderate dem who isn’t a lunatic in 2022 on the ballot instead of newsome??!!!

  3. There is a problem when virtually all government employees vote, donate and campaign exclusively to the Democrat Party. Like it or not, this infects non-partisan city budget allocations and public school curriculum bias. Only voters can change this current one-party domination of non-partisan public institutions. Or the majority voters need to own up to what they keep voting for.

  4. I would ask some of the same questions, and some different ones.
    1. Are you aware that fed / state / county governments have access to resources you need to advance the cause of your city? What is your understanding of those resources, and your ability to navigate and harness them, to our citizens’ benefit?
    2. Are you willing to outlaw VRBO units? Because they are taking housing units off the market and destroying neighborhoods. Prior administrations are ok with that. How are you different?
    3. Senior City Staff is heading for the door. Current council and mayor lean on far them too much for direction in difficult situations, like climate change, homelessness, etc. How are you different? On what subjects are you willing to do the work to research the best solutions and lead?
    4. People should not be building and living in high fire zones. We have multiple such zones and many of those can’t get homeowners insurance. The California Insurance Commissioner does not support giving California resources to these zones. The City Council voted ADUs into these districts in 2018, AFTER the Paradise Fire. Randy Rowse and Cathy Murillo voted for that because they think ALL districts need to eat ADUs. What are you willing to do to protect citizens in these zones?
    5. The state is planning to pass SB314, which would make parklets permanent. Given that, how do you feel about the current Mayor and Council appointing Dem Party hacks, without any experience, to the State St Advisory Committee?
    6. The Delta variant has changed the COVID19 game. It’s a new frontier, and it appears we will be trying to run ahead of variants with vaccines / boosters / masks, with brief windows opening up, but dealing with COVID for awhile. What can you do, as mayor, to keep businesses open in this world, kids going to school, and our city running, given this new world we’re moving into?
    7. Some downtown property owners choose to let properties lie fallow, seeking the highest rent they can get, vs letting a popup or startup make a go of it. They keep sales taxes from the city, while driving up city costs in policing / fire / ambulance responses. Are you supportive of a fine / tax on these property owners for vacant storefronts? Such a fine / tax could be used to fund services for the homeless, who tend to colonize vacant storefronts.
    8. Are you in support of paying people who work here a living wage, vs driving them to seek our housing further, which means subsidizing businesses by getting us all to pay road and gas taxes? Or forcing them to live in their cars?

Weapon Brandishing at Milpas Gas Station

Sheriff’s Office Seeks Public Assistance in Identifying Motorcyclist