Santa Barbara Delays Short-Term Rental Ordinance Decision Over Fire Risks, Housing Concerns; Seeks Revisions

The Santa Barbara Ordinance Committee has postponed deciding on an STR ordinance proposal after the April 21 meeting, citing that the ordinance is “not ready”.

The committee said that more time was needed to make changes to the document. It also noted that safety concerns had been raised regarding areas with high fire hazards, such as Yankee Farm.

Community members said temporary residents were often unaware of what to do in case of a fire emergency, including restrictions on campfires and fireworks.

For communities situated on hillsides with limited access, such hazards are critical during emergencies. Councilwoman Kristen Sneddon also supported banning STRs in these areas and incorporating fire hazard maps into the ordinance.

Another change requested by community members was in connection with the rising influence of STR in these neighborhoods. The majority of people noted that streets in the area now look like “hotels”.

Others also highlighted changes in neighborhood character, saying it has become harder for residents to live there.

Another concern raised by community members was the growing presence of STRs in these neighborhoods. Many said streets now resemble “hotel districts.”

According to them, the focus of STRs is geared more towards the benefit of visitors than that of the residents who need homes in the city.

However, STR owners and organizations that supported the measure gave a different perspective. For example, members of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association (SBCTA) talked about the importance of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue in supporting police, fire, and other city services.

They also noted that STRs typically offers lower-cost accommodations than hotels, and provides more access for visitors to coastal areas. In addition, several homeowners reported that rental income helps pay for mortgages, tax bills, and pensions.

Following the decision, SBCTA Executive Director Thomas Widroe welcomed the decision.

“I commend the City Council for today’s decision which is important not only for locals who rely on short-term rentals to afford to live in Santa Barbara but for all Santa Barbara taxpayers who will ultimately be impacted by major changes to city budget and tourism revenue,” Widroe said.

Concerns about legality and environmental issues were also discussed as some arguing there could be conflicts between the ordinance and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It was also stressed that constitutional property rights must be considered in future decisions.

Another issue raised was the slow response to complaints, particularly in cases of nighttime noise.