Opinion: CARP Growers Bribe the School District

By Peggy Lamb

[This Op-Ed is in response to recent reports of the Carpinteria School District working with local marijuana growers. Read KEYT’s story for more information.]

What’s next? Cannabis laced cupcakes at the school bake sale? CARP Growers has the audacity of bribing Carpinteria School District with a measly sum of money earmarked for a drug and alcohol counselor at the schools. I’m a fan of sarcasm and Mad Magazine, but come on guys, really?

Like the oil companies campaigning for a clean environment and the tobacco companies donating to find a cure for lung cancer, the cannabis growers have now jumped aboard the sleazy tactic of buying off those most adversely affected by their industry. I find some humor in the fact that one argument given was that Carp High School students don’t mind the odor. Huh? It’s like going to the Santa Barbara Bowl and enjoying the high of the surrounding pot smokers.

The bottom line is the CARP Growers want to make money regardless of the impact on Carpinteria. It’s the bad neighbor who moved in next door and there is no law protecting you. BUT, the schools are responsible to protect the children, yes even the teenagers. Taking money from cannabis growers is like dedicating your athletic stadium to Jack Daniels because Uncle Jack was so nice to donate the funds.

It’s bad enough that CARP Growers bought off Das Williams, but heh, he’s a politician and isn’t that one of the perks? In seriousness, I implore the Carpinteria School District Board to rethink taking the money. It’s hypocritical.


Do you have an opinion on something local? Share it with us at ed@edhat.com. The views and opinions expressed in Op-Ed articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of edhat.

Avatar

Written by Anonymous

What do you think?

Comments

2 Comments deleted by Administrator

Leave a Review or Comment

40 Comments

  1. at 1:07 – so being “pro-weed” is sleazy? Why? Tell me what’s wrong with adults being ok with other adults choosing to use a non-lethal, non-addictive substance for either personal reasons or medicinal ones? What’s wrong with that?

  2. Even under the best of intentions, the optics are always bad when a high school receives money from booze or drug sources. I would hope that the district refuses donations from the likes of Budweiser, Pacific Beverage, or Island Brewing (for example). And not to derail the thread, but if they do keep it let’s hope it’s not that same result as that lottery money (as the general budget decreased by an amount equal to the lottery money, for the same net).

  3. I think it’s okay for the school district to accept donations from any business as long as there are no strings attached. But to take a photo donning the weed growers’ uniforms and hats? Very strange and foolish choice… And a really bad look for the school district.

  4. i second this: at 1:07 – so being “pro-weed” is sleazy? Why? Tell me what’s wrong with adults being ok with other adults choosing to use a non-lethal, non-addictive substance for either personal reasons or medicinal ones? What’s wrong with that?

  5. “But seeing the photo and knowing that it’s some type of partnership is really shady and people have the right to be upset. Education shouldn’t be in the pocket of big business.”
    How do you know there is a “partnership”? making a false claim is just as shady. Education shouldn’t be in the pocket of big business? yeah and a lot of other things. So what. We need more funding for schools. If it comes from a farmer, so be it.

  6. I grew up in SB attended public schools. Let me tell you that weed was rampant in our schools decades before prop 64. I don’t think this means they are going to start handing out joints in everyone’s sack lunch. Our schools were underfunded two decades ago and still are today as far as i know. Would these funds be acceptable if the CARP growers grew hemp, tobacco, hops, avocados, grapes?

  7. I support the cannabis industry but the photo op and publicity regarding this donation is idiotic. This is a divided community. For these two entities to broadcast this tour with school district officials wearing hats is clearly a political move, a move which could have derailed the donation all together.

  8. The problem that my neighborhood has is that there is a smell problem and an ordinance against it, but the smell enforcers have decided that the illegal smell generator has more rights than the neighborhood. This is bad government.

  9. “What’s next? Cannabis laced cupcakes at the school bake sale? ”
    No. entertaining such absurdities is intellectually dishonest and destroys your credibility.
    (Just a few minutes ago I read about a fellow named Sohrab Ahmari claiming that, if the Democrats win in 2020 they will rebuild the Colliseum and and feed Christians to the lions. Don’t be like that guy.)

  10. If CARP growers independently made a donation to the school for a drug/alcohol counselor, bravo for them. But seeing the photo and knowing that it’s some type of partnership is really shady and people have the right to be upset. Education shouldn’t be in the pocket of big business.

  11. Sin taxes – once you become dependent on the income, the sin gets institutionalized. If this pot group really wanted to do something, they could have set up their own private “drug counseling” service off campus and conducted all their community service activities, without embedding themselves into the public schools.

  12. It’s funny how people think that if you smoke weed that you are a addict. I partake like maybe 4 times a year. I wonder how often the one’s condemning other people’s harmless personal freedom’s are drinking alcohol or popping pain pills prescribed by a doctor? If you answer to neither of those, then good on you, just don’t forget that it’s legal now and here to stay.

  13. The branding phenomena is totally out of hand. The only place I’d like to see it increase is on politician’s clothing whenever they campaign or show up at public functions or in any official capacity. At those times, they should wear outfits with the logos of their sponsors like NASCAR racers do: Let voters know whose views they represent so we can vote our own political preferences whatever they are.

  14. so, one of the biggest issues was carp school. and so the school district started working on a fix, with the growers……… why is this bad? its called coming together, discussing the problem and fixing it. let alone the tax from this product is already slated for use by the school district.
    neighbors work together, not close doors in each others faces. The santa barbara Bowl comment was interesting though, as though smoking and growing it have the same effect on surrounding areas. Next time, lets get real info instead of sensationalizing it. Growing cannabis does not transfer “active properties” of the plant to anyone through smell/ air. If this was the case, people could just sit in a room with a plant and “enjoy” it. which isnt the case.

  15. Local politicians are all pretty much owned by the local public employee unions. Yes, it would be nice to see them wearing those brands as they sit across the table and negotiate our tax dollars for their patron’s benefit.

County Supervisors Announce Public Meeting on ICE

Rep. Carbajal’s Gun Violence Prevention Bill Passes Committee