By Dan Walters | CalMatters Commentary
Multiple state agencies spent nearly $24 billion on housing and homeless programs in the first five years of Gavin Newsom’s governorship, but the number of people without homes continued to grow, rising by 20% to more than 180,000 in the most recent federal count in 2023.
State Auditor Grant Parks cited that stunning level of spending this year in a sharply worded report concluding that the California Interagency Council on Homelessness, Newsom’s umbrella agency that’s supposed to coordinate and track state programs, has utterly failed to do so.
Parks said the agency “has not aligned its action plan for addressing homelessness with its statutory goals, nor has it ensured that it collects accurate, complete, and comparable financial and outcome information from homelessness programs. Until Cal ICH takes these critical steps, the state will lack up‑to‑date information that it can use to make data‑driven policy decisions on how to effectively reduce homelessness.”
City and county governments have spent additional billions of dollars on homelessness, which stands at the top of the list of worrisome issues continuously cited by California voters in polls.
If spending of that magnitude — probably $30 billion-plus by now — has not made noteworthy progress on reducing homelessness, one must wonder how much it would cost to provide shelter and necessary support services for every homeless person in the state.
No one in Newsom’s administration or the Legislature has ventured into that analytical territory. As Parks says, state officials don’t even know how well their current programs are working, and until they do, the state cannot chart a comprehensive and realistic plan for ultimate success.
Nevertheless, a report presented to the Los Angeles City Council by the city’s homelessness services agency gives us a rough idea of what it would cost and it’s a truly stunning number, something north of $100 billion or more than $500,000 for each homeless person.
Los Angeles has a quarter of the state’s homeless population, about 45,000, and the staff report calculated that it would cost $2.2 billion a year for 10 years, of the city’s own funds and support from federal, state and county governments, to build enough housing for everyone now on city streets and expected to become homeless during the decade.
To make it happen, the report says, the city would have to increase its spending from the current $1.4 billion over 10 years to $4.7 billion and garner matching increases of $2.5 billion from the county, $3.7 billion from the state and $3.3 billion from the federal government for housing, plus another $3.7 billion from the county for 9,000 additional “higher level of care” beds.
Margot Kushel, a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco and director of the school’s Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, told the Los Angeles Times that the report’s figures appear to be a realistic cost to “counteract decades of starved funding” for low-income housing and social services.
“In some ways, it’s an eye-popping dollar amount,” Kushel said. “In other ways, it doesn’t seem that eye-popping to me for the scale of the problem.”
Projecting the report’s estimates to the entire state, California would have to commit about $10 billion a year for a decade — and that’s just for housing. The social and medical services that are vital to prevent newly housed people from once again dropping out would cost many billions more.
Californians consider ending homelessness, particularly the proliferation of squalid encampments, to be a very high priority. But are they willing to spend the big bucks to get it done, and are their elected officials willing to divert the funds from other programs, or raise taxes, that a successful program would require?
CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to Commentary.
What this does not study is the decades of policy that have created homeless people. Among the most damaging was the rush to convert single resident occupancy hotels into tourist destinations and condos. Coupled with the elimination or almost all “general relief” programs which were often enough to allow marginally competent folks to find shelter/food/sanitation on a very limited income. The “welfare Queen” trope was devastating in enforcing policy that punished people who could not compete with most. This is the population that has ended up in the streets, river beds, parks, aged RVs, local jails and (occasionally but not often enough) in mental health facilities. The beneficiaries of these policies need to cough up some bucks to compensate the community for their kleptomania. Tax the rich to serve the poor is pretty good motto and a balanced concept of justice.
they have been trying to solve this problem for decades and they never will, no matter how much money is taken from the tax payers. There is so much money being made by “non profits” that there is not true incentive to solve it. The old adage is still applies “build it and they will come”.
It will never end it and the more handouts that are provided to the people that don’t work, the less incentive they have to take care of themselves. There are a lot of people whoneed help and mental health support, and I think reopening state hospitals would be a solution for some. But this is a problem that will never be resolved, sadly, because people make active decisions to put themselves there.
Can anyone explain the data in https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-highest-and-lowest-rates-of-homelessness/ ? California has a homeless rate nearly 4 times higher than Florida?
1) Get rid of the ACLU and allow GOVERNMENT to help these people get off drugs by providing FORCED Drug Rehabilitation
2) Create cost affective “tent cities” that provide housing, food and REHAB for those on the streets.
3) Once REHAB is complete, job tramandate training in the much needed trades such as welding, plumbing, concrete, asphalt, etc.
4) Once Rehab and training are complete, provide a JOB.
The above will cost less then One Billion over 5 yrs.
Show us the spreadsheet or you’re just spouting BS.
What’s the point, Forced Drug Rehabilitation has been deemed unconsitutional by the ACLU. Again, that organization has done more to promote the degradation of our society due to “homeless” (vagrant/drug addicted living on our streets) so called “protections” than any other government or non-government organization. THAT is why you don’t see the street living-drug/alcohol- addicted on the streets in other countries around the world.
But…You do see that around the world. Just not in your bubble.
COAST – how do you know all that fascism will cost “less then (sic) One Billion?” Does that include the millions in tax payer dollars to defend the government against all the civil rights lawsuits your forced rehab and concentration camps will cause?
For a Con, you sure don’t mind wasting our tax money. I thought your kind were all against that?