This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
By Dan Walters | CalMatters Commentary
Four months into Donald Trump’s second presidency, Republican legislative leaders are attempting to give him some major victories. Two of the most contentious issues now awaiting votes would have particularly heavy impacts on California.
One pending measure would cancel, or at least try to cancel, California’s long-standing waiver of federal clean air rules that allows the state to impose tighter restrictions on emissions. More specifically, legislation that passed the House of Representatives — with support from several dozen Democrats — is pending in the Senate and would undermine California’s decree that no new gasoline-powered cars could be sold in the state after 2035.
Another issue is whether a $10,000 cap on the deductibility of state and local taxes on federal tax returns, passed in 2017 during Trump’s first stint as president, will remain in force, be repealed or be altered.
It has the effect of raising federal levies on taxpayers in states with high income tax rates, such as California, and is seen by leaders of those states as punitive. When the cap was enacted, California tax authorities estimated that it would cost Californians another $12 billion a year.
When the House voted a few weeks ago to cancel California’s Clean Air Act waiver — and those of other states that have followed its lead — Gov. Gavin Newsom cried foul, contending that the action illegally invoked the Congressional Review Act.
“Trump Republicans are hellbent on making California smoggy again,” Newsom said in a statement. “Clean air didn’t used to be political. In fact, we can thank Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon for our decades-old authority to clean our air.
“The only thing that’s changed is that big polluters and the right-wing propaganda machine have succeeded in buying off the Republican Party — and now the House is using a tactic that the Senate’s own parliamentarian has said is lawless.”
During his first presidency, Trump tried to cancel California’s waiver but failed. The nation’s automakers, although displeased by the 2035 decree, didn’t back Trump’s move.
That was then and this is now. Sales of zero emission vehicles, which were booming a few years ago, have flattened. California had contended that 35% of new vehicle sales in California would be zero emission cars by 2025, but purchases seem to be stuck at about 25%. Major automakers, such as General Motors, now contend that the 2035 mandate is unrealistic.
On Tuesday, U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune declared that the chamber would soon vote on the waiver, indicating that he has the votes, and it could garner support from some Democrats, as it did in the House. Its passage probably would touch off a legal battle.
The aforementioned deductibility of state and local taxes, dubbed SALT by the issue’s political warriors, is less settled.
“The SALT deduction has become an outsize stumbling block for Republicans trying to pass a $3.8 trillion tax proposal that would extend President Trump’s 2017 tax cuts and roll back subsidies for clean energy, among other things,” the New York Times reported last week.
“A group of Republican House members, mostly from New York, New Jersey and California, have vowed to vote no on the package unless the cap, which helped pay for the 2017 cuts and expires this year, is raised or abolished. And even among the holdouts, there is dissension — something that drew attention … during a Republican caucus meeting with Speaker Mike Johnson.”
The issue cuts across party lines, pitting legislators from the most affected states against mostly red states that are largely unaffected. While Trump apparently wants to keep the $10,000 cap, the possibility of raising it, perhaps to $30,000, is kicking around. The issue remains deadlocked.
Op-Ed’s are written by community members, not representatives of edhat. The views and opinions expressed in Op-Ed articles are those of the author’s.
[Do you have an opinion on something local? Share it with us at info@edhat.com.]
Also Read
- Op-Ed: A Spate of New Studies Gives the Lowdown on California’s Sky-High Living Costs
- Op-Ed: Newsom’s Gas Price Crusade Morphs Into Bid to Keep Refiners Open
- Op-Ed: They Took Her Passport and Treated Her ‘Like Property.’ Will a New California Law Help Workers Like Her?
- Op-Ed: Even California’s Iconic Industries Are Cutting Back in This Sluggish Economy
- Op-Ed: Sheriff Brown’s War on Transparency
No State should be able to dictate what an American should choose for his or her vehicle. Not everyone can afford an expensive EV and not everyone owns a home. The infrastructure for charging is not near what the amount of EV’s at 2035 , would need. Neither is the power consumption able to be met.
Let the free market dictate, what the public wants to drive. Already the car manufacturers have had to cut back production of EV’s because of the publics disinterest. Mostly for the aforementioned concerns.
Onerous property taxes by States like NY, CA, and NJ, should not be subsidized by the other States. Let those states citizens vote out the people that are implementing these crushing taxes instead of holding up an enormously beneficial Tax, immigration and energy bill. That is why people cannot retire in States like NY. My brother lives in Nassau County LI. He has a modest home worth about $600,000 and pays $15.000 a year in Property tax. In NV, a home worth the same you would pay approx $2000 a year. One of the reasons why Californians are moving to NV in droves. Let these blue states Governors reduce the property taxes instead of holding the rest of the country hostage for tax subsidy
Actually, it’s a vast conspiracy. Blue state governors want to move liberal voters into red states. Nevada is already considered purple, and Texas and Florida are getting there. The secret strategy is working!
Don’t forget, CA subsidizes red states, not the other way around.
That attitude loses elections. Very pompous.
And sadly that lack of knowledge you possess wins them apparently.
That’s just a fact, Jack. One that I was simply pointing out. No attitude, just facts.
Try it sometime. It be a novel approach to life for you.
Yup. These days, an attitude that values facts above unfounded opinion does seem to win elections. Unfortunate for us all, though. And yes, you are always very pompous.
*lose* elections, not win.
Go home.
The (C)half-wit strikes again.
Keep paying those property taxes . Nice to see it is going to fixing State Street as promised. Spent the last 3 days stepping over the half dead , would have walked in the street, but no pedestrian could. all small motorcycles at 35-40 mph only. Nice to see your keeping up with the ‘new’ and improved State Street. more ‘for lease signs’ than ever before, so you people stay the course. Seems you upper crust white folks do not deserve to be the stewards of such a jewel. Seems you need an influx of blue collar working class to finally do what is needed.
Please stay in your smoke, smog, and alcohol filled paradise. It has really stunted your cognitive abilities.