Fight on Walnut Lane

and this really matters how?

Gauchogurl - why are you bringing up domestic violence? Everyone here as already determined it must be gang-related. They're a very wise bunch, these folks. ;)

I think the law or policy is that if there are visible indications of assault on the abused person then the accused is required to be arrested.

LUVADUCK - 1.) Why does it always have to be about gender/sex with you? There are plenty of violent female gangsters here, it's not "mostly young men & boys." And even if it was, how does that further your argument? 2.) Where does it say anywhere in the original post that this was gang-related? Why do you assume so much?

I understand and appreciate the oversight of the Constitution. I'm just so <tired> of such a small number (mostly young men & boys) causing so much damage to their community and each other at such a huge expense. Since these gangs only excuse for being is to do the harm they are doing, there must be a better way to handle it than enabling them by paying to have them put back together after they assault each other. The way it is now, they get bragging rights for their scars/jail tats.

LUVADUCK - good luck with that, but this pesky thing called the Constitution doesn't allow us to just go out and "round up" people and punish them for a crime they themselves might not have even been part of. Also, forced labor is one of those not so legal things.

No just residents protecting what's theirs

"This was not gang involved." Gee willikers, musta been a couple of Little League Baseball teams practicing.

This was not gang involved. I do not believe a single one of the commentators were actually there. Rumors and heresy get innocent people hurt. Unless 100 Please dont repeat untruths.