Amid chants of “we’re not going back,” Kamala Devi Harris accepted the Democratic presidential nomination Thursday night, vowing a “new way forward” to turn the page on the Donald Trump era and heal the nation’s bitter political divisions.
In a 37-minute address to the Democrats’ national convention, the 59-year-old Vice President pledged compassionate domestic policies, combined with a muscular national security strategy, contrasting both with the approach of Republican rival Trump.
Capping an astonishing eight-week period in American politics, Harris paid brief tribute to President Joe Biden, the man she replaced at the top of the ticket, then recounted her biography as the daughter of immigrants, weaving the values she learned as a child into a narrative about her career as a criminal prosecutor and elected official, saying they would shape her presidency.
“Every day in the courtroom, I stood proudly before a judge and said five words, ‘Kamala Harris, for the People,’” she said. “And to be clear: My entire career, I have only had one client: The People.”
She contrasted that a moment later with “the only client (Trump) has ever had: Himself.”
In her most direct plea for support from independent and moderate Republican voters, who were represented by a series of convention speakers over the past four days, Harris looked directly into the camera.
“With this election, our nation has a precious, fleeting opportunity to move past the bitterness, cynicism, and divisive battles of the past,” the vice president said.
“A chance to chart a new way forward. Not as members of any one party or faction. But as Americans.
“I know there are people of various political views watching tonight,” she added. “And I want you to know: I promise to be a President for all Americans.”
As a political matter, Harris’s speech featured what are likely to be critical issues in the 11 weeks left before the Nov. 5 election, as Trump maneuvers to tie her tightly to Biden on a trio of issues with which voters have expressed unhappiness, while she tries to fight on more favorable terrain, which she underscored in her acceptance.
Here are five key takeaways.
National security. Knowing she needs to overcome doubts about her qualifications to serve as Commander in Chief, Harris spent a long stretch of her speech discussing national security affairs, presenting a stance that differed little from the strong military, internationalist stance that Biden has pursued, saying she would continue to stand with Ukraine against Russian aggression, for example, but wielding even stronger rhetoric.
In doing so, she sought to draw a sharp contrast with Trump’s “America First” isolationism, as well, as his professed admiration for strongmen nationalist leaders around the world:
“As Commander-in-Chief, I will ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world. I will fulfill our sacred obligation to care for our troops and their families.
“I will make sure that…we strengthen – not abdicate our global leadership,” she said. “Trump on the other hand, threatened to abandon NATO. He encouraged Putin to invade our allies. He said Russia could – quote – ‘do whatever the hell they want.’”
“As President, I will never waver in defense of America’s security and ideals. Because, in the enduring struggle between democracy and tyranny, I know where I stand—and where the United States of America belongs.”
The economy. Polls show that two-thirds of Americans say the country is on the wrong track, with continuing concern about high prices and inflation.
She described it only the broadest of strokes, however, again making significant differences with Biden’s views difficult to discern, although it was notable that she pledged to “end America’s housing shortage,” embracing an issue that increasingly registers as a growing concern among voters.
“An opportunity economy where everyone has a chance to compete and a chance to succeed.
“As President, I will bring together labor and workers, small business owners and entrepreneurs. And American companies. To create jobs. Grow our economy. And lower the cost of everyday needs. Like health care. Housing. And groceries.”
Immigration. Even more the economy, Harris is politically vulnerable on widespread voter concerns about the number of political and economic refugees who have cross the southern border illegally during the Biden term.
While Trump and his allies for weeks have pounded her with paid advertising identifying her as the Administration’s “border czar” and attacking her for its failures, Harris last night tried to perform political ju-jitsu by blaming the Republican for torpedoing a tough bipartisan immigration bill to keep the issue on the front burner during the campaign.
“Last year, Joe and I brought together Democrats and conservative Republicans to write the strongest border bill in decades,” she said. “The Border Patrol endorsed it.
“But Donald Trump believes a border deal would hurt his campaign. So he ordered his allies in Congress to kill the deal,” Harris added. “Well, I refuse to play politics with our security. Here is my pledge to you: As President, I will bring back the bipartisan border security bill that he killed, and I will sign it into law.”
Abortion rights. A woman’s constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, enshrined in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, was overturned two years ago, in the Dobbs decision, by a conservative Supreme Court including three justices appointed by Trump.
Trump soon after took credit for, and boasted about the decision, playing to his evangelical base, but more recently has tried to distance himself from Dobbs, saying it was now a state’s rights issue over which he has no influence.
Abortion is perhaps Trump’s biggest political vulnerability, however, and in her acceptance address, Harris pressed the advantage, turning to language in “Project 2025,” a 900-page blueprint for a second Trump term produced by the right-wing Heritage Foundation.
“And get this: he plans to create a National Anti-Abortion Coordinator, and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions.
“Simply put: They are. Out. Of. Their. Minds,” she enunciated slowly, to a huge cheer from the delegates. “And one must ask: why exactly is it that they don’t trust women? Well. We. Trust. Women.”
We are not going back. Harris sharply attacked Trump over his indictment for his actions involving the Jan. 6 seditious order, but also his two civil court defeats in New York, for business fraud and sexual assault.
She denounced the “chaos and calamity when he was in office,” but said even more serious has been his unstinting refusal to accept his 2020 defeat for the past four years in portraying him as a menace to the most fundamental structure of American government.
Moreover, she pointed to the Supreme Court’s recent decision creating a new standard for immunity for actions presidents take in office, as well as “Project 2025” in arguing that he would be utterly unaccountable for whatever actions he took in his second term, no matter how reckless, ruthless or unpopular.
“Just imagine Donald Trump with no guardrails. How he would use the immense powers of the presidency of the United States. Not to improve your life. Not to strengthen our national security.
“We know what a second Trump term would look like,” she said. “But America, we are not going back.”
Seventy-five days until the election.
A few hours before Harris’s speech, Supervisor Laura Capps checked in with Newsmakers from Chicago, where she was hanging out at the convention with her cadre of Washington and national political pals, from her days as a speechwriter and communications aide to the late Senator Ted Kennedy and President Bill Clinton.
“There’s so much incredible energy here,” Capps said, quickly adding, “But there’s definitely that lesson of, we can’t just have fun – we only have 76 days, we’ve got to work hard. Staying pumped up for the next 76 days is the meta message here.”
In our conversation, Laura also talked about her political junkie’s love of conventions, her reaction to Oprah Winfrey’s surprise speech on Wednesday night, her professional take on the overtime address by her old boss, the new tone toward Trump supporters being proposed by convention speakers and what she foresees for the next 11 weeks. Plus: breakfast with the California delegation.
Check out our conversation with Laura Capps via YouTube below or by clicking through this link. The podcast version is here.
Gus Walz – with a Joyous Smile & tears streaming down his face “That’s My Dad”! 💓
Family values at it best…
So…. What exactly has she been doing the last 4 years to inact her great plans? What a joke. She was the worst VP in history per the Democrats 6 months ago , now all of the sudden she’s the savior of Democracy 😆
Couldn’t agree more with you. It’s more fluff and kumbaya buzz words from the Democrats. Whoever still falls for it doesn’t deserve to vote
Absolutely! The “dem’s” are the worst – except for today’s Republicans.
Maybe because you fail to educate yourself with facts and figures and instead choose to parrot talk shows and tv actors. So your world view is not actually based on facts, nor figures, but instead opinion. All created by design to keep people fooled.
How does it feel to be the fool? Foolish. But once you accept it, that feeling goes away. People are pretty forgiving when you come forward and move forward. But if you keep being a fool, that’s on you. You will have no one to blame but yourself what comes your way.
🤣🤣
Hound – I believe you meant “enact” – but I have some sad news for you: the vice-president does not enact policy. I mean, where are all the Mike Pence plans? How many administrations have been defined by the vice-president? Who was the last VP who set the policy to an extent that they could be called the “best” or “worst”? Again, if Harris is the “worst VP in history” what does that make Pence? I believe that your orange Fuhrer called his veep a “traitor” when he followed the law and certified Trump’s defeat. Isn’t he the worst? Just for fun, and to see what’s behind your absolute judgement, who do you believe was the BEST VP in history? (And why – tell us why he was the best and Harris is the worst. Specific examples, please.)
I believe that as VP she is the president of the Senate. And I agree, Mike Pence was a loser too.
President of the Senate is, indeed, what the constitution envisioned – but that role has been diminished to the point that the VP’s role is mostly symbolic. The only power they exercise is coming in to cast tie-breaking votes. As VP, they have always supported their boss’ position when they do so. But, again, I am curious to know who you believe was the “best” VP in history, and why. If you’re so sure about the “worst,” you must know who you believe was best, right?
Hard to say, but I was not the one who called Harris’ the worst. It was the Dem’s.
“the Dem’s”
What “Dem’s” are you speaking of?
And please learn to use an apostrophe for fuck’s sake.
Any “dem’s” in particular? You’ve got to stop parroting all the quotes you see on Truth Social. Who convinced you that the VP is so powerful? Who is telling you who you think is the “worst VP in history?” You don’t even seem to know what the VP does! Think before you post and be sure that your thoughts are coherent and fact-based. Tell us what YOU think, not just what you’ve been told.
HH, I guess you don’t understand what a US VP does and doesn’t do. That aside, it’s really fun watching you guys shit your pants over this woman.
She was busy getting ZERO delegates last election and avoiding her responsibilities at the border but when the President says hes going to get a woman as his running mate and the best options are republican he is stuck deciding between Kamala and AOC and then Nancy runs a coup against sleepy Joe……
People are so emotional with this election. If you didn’t hate this or that candidate, whose policies would you like enacted and the results 20 years own the road? It really matters with this election.
Sorry, after so much vitriol towards the other candidate and therefore vitriol against half the country, I cannot buy the “unity” thing. Just more kumbaya.
It will be nice to see the hatred that the Orange Moron cultivated go away, hopefully for good.
ANON – wishful thinking, unfortunately. The hatred, cruelty and bigotry of the far right has always been here. It’s only that he’s given them more of a voice. It will always be here, whether he wins (unlikely) or not. Should the latter happen, I think it’s guaranteed he won’t go quietly into the night. We all saw last time he lost!
But yes, it would be wonderful if the country could move on in hope and enthusiasm and the miserable hateful fringebwas cast back to the shadow where they belong.
Yeah you exude love and unity every day here honey
Hey buttercup, I’m not your “honey.”
I’m confused.. Are you saying the DNC has been sending vitriol to the Republicans? That would be quite a statement without recognizing how hateful the GOP/MAGA crowd is towards anyone different than their cult followers, especially given some of your own hateful comments on edhat “BoomB.”
Neither one is a good choice. Its a shame that some of the people that would be good leaders don’t want that job anymore! I think Harris is the least favorable choice.
I guess some people prefer psychosis and orange chaos over competence and intellect.
Today, Trump has a proven track record relative to what he did during his presidency benefiting most American’s in one way or another. I believe Trump will continue to benefit Americans as president. Harris and Walz are documented liars and will say what people want to hear for votes, i.e., for years Harris voted against “the wall,” now she wants “the wall.” Walz? Well Walz, in my opinion, aside from being a documented liar aside from carrying other negative baggage, especially relative to his military service. Walz comes across as being f’in nuts.
Anybody whose memory is so glazed with rose-colored memories of Trump’s disastrous presidency definitely “comes across as being f’in nuts.”
DOULIE – in what why are they “documented liars?”
If lying is a problem for you, do you honestly believe Trump hasn’t lied about anything?
Doulie, you are welcome to your own opinion but you are not welcome to spread misinformation, which is what most of your post is full of.
Do_u_lie about everything?
ANON – Doulie, as well as his buddies Coast and Basic, have a seething disregard for facts and the truth. It’s like vampires and holy water.
How, exactly, did Trump’s Presidency “benefit most Americans.”
And please learn to use an apostrophe.
The plural of American is not “American’s”, it is “Americans”.
You would only use the ‘s to demonstrate possession.
“Harris and Walz are documented liars”
HA! That’s hysterical. You’re funny. Thanks, I needed that laugh.
Just google this: “trump documented lies”
SAIL – why do you think she’s worse than Trump? Are there certain traits she lacks that he has? Is it a policy distinction? Experience? Honestly curious what your thoughts are on this and you’re one of the more reasonable conservative commenters here, so I’m interested to hear what you think.
Why is Harris the least favorable in your opinion?
Making Trump the most favorable?!?! Get a grip, man!