Edhat Staff
In a pivotal courtroom debate, the aftermath of the 2019 Conception dive boat fire, which claimed 34 lives in a devastating maritime tragedy, resurfaces as discussions on restitution unfold.
Jerry Boylan, the boat’s captain, found himself at the heart of a legal tussle last Thursday over the financial compensation for the families of the victims, following his conviction for neglect leading to the deadliest maritime disaster in recent U.S. history.
Boylan was previously convicted under a historic seaman’s manslaughter statute, receiving a sentence of four years in prison in addition to supervised release. The conviction pivoted on his failure to adhere to safety regulations, notably the absence of an overnight watch that could have detected the fire sooner.
The contention now lies in the scope and nature of restitution, with the prosecution advocating for coverage of funeral costs among other expenses. However, Boylan’s attorney, Gabriela Rivera, challenges the linkage between Boylan’s actions and the tragic outcomes, suggesting financial penalties should be confined to documented expenses.
Judge George Wu, presiding over the case, has underscored the established failure to meet safety norms during Boylan’s trial, dismissing the defense’s argument against restitution. Yet, the defense paints a picture of financial incapability on Boylan’s part, pointing to his reliance on Social Security and bleak employment prospects.
This court session emerges as a continuation of the narrative following the disaster off Santa Cruz Island, sparking legislative and maritime safety reforms alongside ongoing civil litigation against various parties, including the boat owners and the Coast Guard.
The next hearing on restitution amounts is scheduled July 29.
