California Assembly Bill 2109 Provides New Protections For White Sharks

By the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
On Monday, Sept. 19, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 2109, providing new protections for white sharks in California waters. White sharks, also called great white sharks, are already a protected species and an important part of the ocean ecosystem as top-level predators. There is enormous public and scientific interest in them.
Sponsored by Assemblymember Steve Bennett, the bill passed the California legislature with an overwhelming majority of support. The new restrictions aim to get ahead of activities that may lead to increased interactions between white sharks and humans, and to give law enforcement more tools to protect white sharks from intentional efforts to catch or attract them. The new law also helps protect the public from interactions with white sharks that have been unintentionally hooked by fishermen by restricting when and where chum and shark bait can be used, while still allowing other legal fishing activities to continue.
“Sharks are one of California’s most iconic marine species, and it’s our responsibility to ensure that their populations are sustained,” Assemblymember Bennett said. “At the same time, public safety is of the utmost importance.”
“This bill represents a collaborative engagement between anglers, the scientific community, the legislature and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to develop proactive, common-sense approaches to further protect California’s iconic white sharks, while also protecting ocean users and preserving recreational fishing opportunities,” said CDFW Director Charlton H. Bonham.
Anglers should note the new rules regarding take of white sharks go into effect on January 1, 2023. These rules, found in California Fish and Game Code, section 5517, prohibit the use of shark bait, shark lures or shark chum to attract a white shark. Anglers also may not place those items into the water within one nautical mile of any shoreline, pier or jetty, when a white shark is visible or known to be present.
CDFW continues to work with partners to proactively address the potential for fishing activities to lead to white shark interactions. The Coastal Conservation Association of California (CCA CAL) is also very supportive of protecting white sharks.
“We fight for responsible and sustainable fishing practices while also supporting regulations to protect our most vulnerable resources,” said Wayne Kotow, executive director for CCA CAL. “We are all stewards of the resources and need to work together for the future of our favorite sport of fishing.”
“We have seen increased use of California beaches as nursery habitat for juvenile white sharks,” said Dr. Chris Lowe, a professor in marine biology and director of the Shark Lab at California State University, Long Beach. “This bill will help reduce fishery interactions with white sharks, helping the protected sharks and ocean users by reducing the risk of hooking these sharks at public beaches and ocean piers where people are swimming, surfing and diving.”
For more information about white sharks, please visit CDFW’s White Shark Information webpage, which includes answers to frequently asked questions, as well as shark incident information going back to 1950. Additional questions may be sent to CDFW’s Marine Region via email.
Comments Penalty Box
No Comments deleted due to down vote
16 Comments deleted by Administrator
72 Comments
-
2
-
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:50 PMNo chumming "for the purpose of viewing any shark when a white shark is visible or known to be present." and No chumming "when a white shark is either visible or known to be present." - Cite to the code: https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB2109/2021
"VISIBLE OR KNOWN TO BE PRESENT"
So, if you see a GW or know that one is near you, you have to stop chumming. So what? How is that so bad? They don't want people trying to attract them.
If you're fishing on a boat or pier and have no idea there's a GW near you, you're not getting fined.
So, again, besides it being a democrat doing this, what's the beef?
-
2
-
1
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:49 PMBurford can't read. "Anglers also may not place those items into the water within one nautical mile of any shoreline, pier or jetty, when a white shark is visible or known to be present."
-
1
-
3
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:42 PMNot politics, its thinking practically. No chumming within a mile of a shoreline, pier or jetty. So if you don't have a boat, how do you expect to fish for shark? Most everyone I know fishes off piers. So this law ends that for any shark fishing. And what's a "shark lure" anyway? Do you think the various fish know what lure is meant for them? Clearly written by people having zero knowledge of fishing. Too many unnecessary laws. Newsom must have writer's cramp by now.
-
1
-
3
-
Sep 30, 2022 01:55 PMMakes absolutely no sense. Ask anyone who actually fishes, they’ll tell you why. Buford summed it up. Why Newsome why? Political PR stunt it seems.
-
1
-
-
Oct 03, 2022 09:41 AMSAIL, that is a big bummer. What did you do with the shark? They aren't great eating. Did you have it mounted and put up on a wall so you could brag?? SHAME.
-
1
-
1
-
Oct 03, 2022 02:50 AM"Makes absolutely no sense."
It does to intelligent people.
-
1
-
2
-
Oct 01, 2022 10:02 AMAgain GeneralTree a false assumption. I don't paddle board. I have in fact accidentally caught a great white while fishing at Guadalupe island!!!!
Funny how your trolling a thread about fishing!!!!!!
-
1
-
2
-
Sep 30, 2022 07:58 PM" a non existent problem." Not according to the DFG people and the fishing community I'm in contact with on a daily basis for the past 30 years. You weekend paddle boarders get on our nerves.
-
1
-
2
-
Sep 30, 2022 07:44 PMabsolutely no beef SACJON, except it is a solution to a non existent problem.
-
1
-
1
-
Sep 30, 2022 06:02 PMSail you couldn't educate me in anything. I've fished constantly and often my whole life, long range, fished shark lots when I was younger, inshore, pier, surf, boats, jetties.. My father was a commercial fisherman. But you do you and keep whining in your dinghy.
-
3
-
1
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:56 PMSAIL - not many and who cares? I know plenty of guys who have mentioned chumming near Carp beach so we could see some juvie GWs and get cool photos. So yeah, it's a thing.
What's your beef with this one?
-
1
-
3
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:51 PMSacjon since your a local fishing expert. How many White Shark anglers/shark divers do you estimate to be active in CA waters? How many of those do you estimate this law will discourage from trying to catch/view a Great White?
-
3
-
1
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:20 PMBASIC - what's your beef? Other than Newsom, obviously. This is doing nothing but prohibiting people from purposefully attracting white sharks. No one's livelihood is being threatened (because there's so many commercial shark fishermen here...) so what are you worried about? I've fished these waters my whole life and never used chum. No one is being prohibited from going after tasty threshers.
-
1
-
3
-
Sep 30, 2022 01:45 PMSo ridiculous. People don't fish for GW sharks. And if one is hooked its quickly and easily cut loose. Baits and chum are what you use for ALL SHARK fishing. So basically this law inhibits all shark fishing. Thanks Gavin, another brilliant move.
-
1
-
-
Oct 03, 2022 09:38 AMSounds like you just don't like Newsome and anything he does you'll criticize. This is a really great thing! NO ONE needs to be shark fishing. The days of the abundant ocean are over. Overfishing is killing everything, and we need this bill. THANK YOU, Governor Newsome, for once AGAIN, doing the right thing for wildlife. How I appreciate a politician who cares for our ecosystem.
-
1
-
-
Oct 03, 2022 02:49 AM"So ridiculous. "
So cover your mirror--problem solved.
-
1
-
-
Oct 01, 2022 09:35 AMWtf who defends shark fishing? Shark meat tastes terrible and needs to be thoroughly soaked because they urinate through their skin (mmm yummy). As apex predators they also have high levels of mercury and heavy metals, which have only continued to rise as the ocean becomes more polluted. This law doesn't go far enough, there is no legit reason to kill sharks.
-
3
-
2
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:29 PMBUFORD - it's simple. It's banning people from TRYING TO ATTRACT great white sharks. If you're chumming for threshers/makos, whatever off your boat and a GW shows up, no one is going to come flying out to arrest you. Now, if F&G comes by and you have massive rigs on your deck/shark cage, etc, while chumming, might be a different story.
The purpose, if any of you bothered to read, is to limit interactions. That means, no attracting GWs near humans for the purpose of "interacting." From the DFG website:
“This bill will help reduce fishery interactions with white sharks, helping the protected sharks and ocean users by reducing the risk of hooking these sharks at public beaches and ocean piers where people are swimming, surfing and diving.” https://wildlife.ca.gov/News/california-assembly-bill-2109-signed-into-law-providing-new-protections-for-white-sharks
Relax.
-
1
-
3
-
Sep 30, 2022 02:21 PMYou have to be kidding. What does a "recent" sighting mean to you? Last hour, day, last week or two? They constantly move around, and being the biggest preditor, they show up when youre minding your own business fishing for anything. Above all, when already protected, what's the point in adding restrictions to OTHER fishing for the possibility of a GW? Unnecessary and a reason to fine someone doing nothing wrong.
-
3
-
1
-
Sep 30, 2022 01:54 PMBUFORD - Calm down, it does not ban all chumming. Read it more closely. Bait/chum only prohibited if using it to actively attract GWs or when you're within 1 mile of a recent sighting. Basically, you're not allowed to attract them to your boat or pier/jetty for "interaction" (cage diving, fishing, etc). You can still go fish for leopards and threshers of the pier, well unless you know there's a big ol' pointer out there nearby!
-
3
-
-
Sep 30, 2022 01:40 PMThanks to Gov. Newsom for signing the bill but ESPECIALLY thanks to our representative Assemblymember Bennett for developing the bill. It is not easy to have that kind of collaboration, especially for a species that so many see as nothing but a hated predator. I hope our next representative, Gregg Hart, will be as sensitive to environmental concerns and issues.
-
4
-
-
Sep 30, 2022 12:18 PMThank you, Governor Newsom! These beautiful and mysterious animals deserve to be left alone!
Pages