Elderly Man Attacked in the Funk Zone

"anonymously" here means hiding one's ID, resulting in posting with an ID like A-1686087470

GeneralTree, unless GENERALTREE is your real name, you are posting anonymously which is what you are criticizing others for doing here. Are you willing to share your real name here? Thought so. The pot calling the kettle black.

Karma - you posted anonymously that Shalhoob's is somehow involved and you are considering this information?

We all have as much credible information as you have - none.

I consider that the only piece of info we have other than what else has been posted here. If you have better information, please share it....since the bar is so low

You consider that proof? Pretty low bar there.

"From what I heard, the victim came to Shalhoob's to serve a subpoena - a second attempt, as the first time he came to serve the subpoena earlier in the day, the owner had claimed to be someone else. The second time, the owner almost ran him over while fleeing, and a second person attacked him, stealing his hat, his phone, and his cane, as shocked bystanders were screaming."

"From what I heard"

FOND - oh.... I see what's going on. You think when someone disagrees with you or doesn't like your comment it's "censorship." Here's a great source for big words like that:

dictionary.com

FOND and CHICO - I don't see any comments that were removed other than BASIC's (surprise surprise). Where were you or anyone "censored" or "banned" or anything other than disagreed with for saying something most don't agree with?

Also..... "triggered" is screaming and crying about being "banned" and "censored" while your comment remains posted with no penalty whatsoever. Seems kinda snowflake-y and trigger-y to me.....

Troll-My name is Chico and that is the opposite of what I am.
I'm gonna guess yours has the same relevance.

Not seeing your comment in the penalty box. Who "banned" you? Who "censored" you. You are on a privately owned website providing low information drivel and it doesn't seem to be getting deleted and you are still posting, so you are apparently not banned. Show us on this doll where other people's opinions hurt your precious feeling. The "F your feelings" crowd suddenly whimpers when they hear something they don't like.

Chico:
That's exactly right!
Try denouncing the horrors that happen more and more often and you get censored by those "free speech advocates"

Just more schizophasia.
Do you ever read what you've written, and see whether it approximates English?
Or whether it expresses any rational thought?

Word salads like you regularly produce may indicate:
a) Incipient schizophrenia.
b) Thinking your smartphone can do speech recognition.

Or wait, maybe my bad.....? An anonymous poster said the owner attacked the man who was "trying to serve a subpoena." GT has been saying "where's the proof?" Also, "maybe it was a former employee" that posted that comment. OK, so what? Maybe it was. Either way, the REAL problem here is, was that comment about the attacker and victim true? If not, folks should be careful what theories they spread, especially when identifying the subject.

KARMA - "No one here is a former employee, there is no conspiracy." - GT isn't the one pushing that theory. The anonymous poster you quoted yesterday was.

Sacjon - an anonymous poster made the claim that one of the Shalhoob family beat up the man while he was trying to serve a subpoena. Sounds like a disgruntled former worker - we shall see, I haven't heard any news that anyone on the Shalhoob team was arrested.

"Besides, the burden of proof is on you." Your wife is your secretary, not me
"Like I'm going to identify myself which would enable one of LJ's henchmen to come after me. No thanks." So you're the disgruntled employee. That makes sense.

Who is LJ?

Besides, the burden of proof is on you. Provide proof that Randy Rowse caused this elderly man to be attacked. A far more outlandish assertion. Next you can ask around- I'd bet that someone who could identify LJ saw him speeding away from the scene.

Like I'm going to identify myself which would enable one of LJ's henchmen to come after me. No thanks.

And do show us the proof where Shalhoob was receiving a subpoena. That could be true - but not going to believe that until I see some proof. Otherwise it's likely a former employee making crap up.

Don't be sad. You are anonymous and probably didn't speak up when people blamed the previous mayor for everything under the sun. But you do you.

Non sequitur much? The victim was trying to deliver a subpoena that the intended recipient didn't want to receive. He was "somehow, mysteriously" attacked. This has nothing to do with Randy Rowse.

FOND
1) Your comment is still there, not "censored." LIE #1. 2) Again, none of that is happening. No one is letting criminals carry out criminal acts without taking action.

Just take a minute and imagine if your statement was actually, even partially true. Cops would be walking by crimes doing nothing. People would be beating each other up outside of bars and nothing would stop them. Shoplifters would be ravaging stores and no one would call the police or report it. DUDE.... read a local news site once in a while. ALL of this is being reported and cops are arresting people DAILY for crimes.

Life is not meant to be lived in so much fear and panic. Sorry, man. I really am sorry.

FOND, you sound unhinged.

You misinterpret what's happening. Edhat removes crazy falsehoods and hateful utterances.

Sacjon:
Keep your head in the sand!
Everything I say is true and happening more and more often even when Edhat CENSORS me for saying it because, according to them, all you can say is that everything is fine and well in California's paradise!

FOND - wowzers! Once again, thank goodness NOTHING that you said is actually true. No wonder people like you think they need guns. Heck, just walking outside must terrifying!

@4:33

Another word salad. Don't worry, the orange moron will be paying for his crimes relatively soon, and you can rest easy in our rules-based society.

there is no danger in the funk zone, the only danger is the OWNER OF SHALHOOBS

Same here. I may not physically put myself into the middle but there are a lot of ways you can help, and we should! Calling 911 isn't enough, in the time it takes help to arrive the person could be seriously injured or dead.

KARMA - nope. BABY and unfortunately you, have not read GT's comments it seems. GT is apparently the only one questioning the truth behind this (possibly defamatory) theory put forth by the anonymous poster at JUN 03, 2023 08:37 AM. GT is quoting other peoples comments and questioning them, not making those comments as his/her own. Weird that you guys are now accusing him of being an employee. I'm not seeing ANYTHING in GT's comments that would suggest he/she is making this up, but rather attacking the veracity of this "theory."

By the way, it's amazing Edhat leaves all these comments up, that identify a person, attribute some crime to them, which very likely may be false and definitely capable of damaging their reputation. Just a thought there.

BABYCAKES IS correct in her assessment that GT is an insider or knows something. I too feel the same.

I think the former, disgruntled employee GT keeps refering to is himself.

GeneralTree: Let's not get distracted from trying to find these perps and bring them to justice. I have read each of your dozen or more comments on this thread. These comments either correct or challenge other comments, so a reasonable person such as myself would conclude that you possibly might have knowledge of what happened prior/during/after this horrific attack. My comment clearly stated that IF you know something, spill the beans to LE. I believe you most likely misinterpreted my "IF you know" as "SINCE you know" or "BECAUSE you know"..., which is not what I wrote. We good....no harm...no foul (except this foul weather!).

Babycakes - -what in the world makes you think I somehow have information? That is ridiculous. Please read the comments before replying to them.

GeneralTree: Please report to LE if you in fact saw LJ nearly run the guy over and had one of his employees attack/beat/rob him. I get it that sometimes we want to protect our friends and family, but PLEASE, in this case, do the right thing!

"LJ was the guy who was getting the subpoena, and later almost ran the elderly guy over." Where's the proof of this statement?