Edhat
npr edvertisers
visitors movie times

Santa Barbara Weather: 57.6°F | Humidity: 97% | Pressure: 29.94in ( Falling) | Conditions: Overcast | Wind Direction: North | Wind Speed: 0.0mph [see map]

Free Newsletter
Advertise
  login You create the news! Send your news item to ed@edhat.com
 
 
login
    15839 Subscribers
      674 Paid (4.3%)
     5 Comments
     3 Commenters
     4191 Page Views
 
 

 
Veterans Day Weekend
Veterans Day Weekend
 
Boxtales 20 Year Anniversary Festival
Boxtales 20 Year Anniversary Festival
 
The Winehound
The Winehound
 
Advertise on Edhat
Advertise on Edhat
 
News Events Referrals Deals Classifieds Comments About

more articles like this

Op Ed: EDC Says Measure J Illegal
updated: Jul 22, 2010, 12:40 PM

Source: EDC

The legacy of Carpinteria's ill-fated Measure J will be determined in court, after the ballot measure failed decisively at polls on June 8, 2010. Today, the Second District Court of Appeal accepted a Brief Amicus Curiae from four local organizations in support of the City of Carpinteria, which alleges that Measure J is unconstitutional and illegal, and should never have been allowed on the ballot in the first place.

In its initial filings, the City described Measure J as improperly granting administrative (or "adjudicatory") powers to the electorate, something that is prohibited by state law. In addition, the City noted that provisions of Measure J violate Article II, Section 12 of the California Constitution, which prohibits private corporations from gaining special privileges or advantages through the voter initiative process.

The Environmental Defense Center (EDC) authored the Amicus Brief on behalf of EDC, the Carpinteria Valley Association (CVA), Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs and Get Oil Out! (GOO!). The purpose of the brief was described in an application filed with the Court of Appeal:

The attached amicus is limited to an examination of how a private corporation's abuse of the voter initiative subverts the purpose of voter initiatives and the local planning process, and threatens public health, safety and the environment. Amici submit this brief in the hope that it will provide the Court with additional insight into how: (1) Venoco, Inc.'s Paredon Oil & Gas Drilling Initiative names and identifies a private corporation to perform functions and to have powers and duties, in violation of Article 2, Section 12 of the California Constitution; (2) the Initiative violates the California Coastal Act by placing unrealistic impediments on the planning process and by frustrating requirements for public participation; and (3) it is impossible to sever offending sections of the Initiative without negating the purpose and application of the Initiative, and/or rendering the Initiative illegal for other reasons.

Although Measure J is dead, its opponents do not want a similar initiative to be allowed on the ballot in the future. As stated in the brief, Amici are concerned that private interests throughout Santa Barbara County and possibly the entire State will be emboldened to use the voter initiative to circumvent city and county permit processes, and to subvert sound local planning and laws protecting the environment.

"We want to shut the door on Measure J once and for all," said Ted Rhodes of Citizens for the Carpinteria Bluffs. "No corporation should be allowed to act like a local government. No corporation should be allowed to re-write a city's general plan."

"We are confident that the City's legal theories are sound," said Nathan Alley, EDC Staff Attorney. "We hope that the brief submitted by Amici will aid the Court in reviewing Carpinteria's appeal. The Constitutional issues at stake are of the highest importance to our community and to the entire State of California."

You can read the full brief online at link.

 

8 comments on this article. Read/Add

  See more articles like this

# # # #

 

Send To a Friend
Your Email
Friend's Email

Top of Page | Old News Archives | Printer-Friendly Page

  Home Subscribe FAQ Jobs Contact copyright © 2003-2014  
Edhat, Inc.