|
Subscriber Comments for
The More Mesa Preservation Coalition
Comments in order of when they were received | (reverse order)
COMMENT 153061
|
2011-03-12 09:23 AM |
|
Isn't More Mesa private property?
|
| |
COMMENT 153066
|
2011-03-12 09:30 AM |
|
How about each of these concerned citizens give up half of their property to the land trust for santa barbara county.
|
| |
COMMENT 153068P
|
2011-03-12 09:35 AM |
|
It used to be the best nude beach around too, due to its isolation.
|
| |
COMMENT 153220P
|
2011-03-13 10:30 AM |
|
061, it refers to the private owner and the hope to be working cooperatively with the owner and adjacent owners.... Good work, MMCoalition --- although I don't live in that area, I hope you succeed. This is one ecosystem and it's important all available earth-space not be covered with houses and other human stuff. Wildlife need habitat; humans need breathing space.
|
| |
COMMENT 158168
|
2011-03-26 05:38 PM |
|
More Mesa is private property owned by a company big enough to pay the property taxes which is why the owners of More Mesa in the 1960s sold it to the company- they could not afford the taxes.
|
| |
40% of comments on this page were made by Edhat Community Members.
QUESTION ABOUT A COMMENT? |
|
See a comment that you think should be deleted?? See a comment that was deleted, that you think shouldn't have been?
Email ed@edhat.com. Thanks!
# # # #
|
|